Does Condoleeza Rice kowtow to the backwards Islamic culture by donning hijab haute coutoure when carrying out US policy or is that honor reserved for the vaunted First Grand-Lady Speaker of the House? Truly a role-model to young girls across Damascus:
I was a little offended and confused by this picture – at first! I mean, why pay for all that plastic surgery if you’re going to throw a paperbag over it anyway, you know? Unless you feared the Syrians cracking the Phoenician-like code in your crow’s feet.
But then, it kind of grew on me. There’s a undeniable transparency about watching someone so enamored with being “the first woman” this or that who will sell-out her sisterhood street-cred in order curry favor with the House of Baby Assad.
And while Lefties were more than uncharitable in their condemnation of Israel for invading Lebanon as Syrian-backed terrorists launched attacks from Lebanese territory in 2006, all seems to be forgiven because we need “dialogue” with the men who ordered the assassination of Lebanon’s Prime Minister. Nuance.
At least Rumsfeld wasn’t wearing oil sheik robes when he shook Hussein’s hand. Let’s hope the right will have sense enough to capitalize on this poli-porn extravaganza courtesy of Hijab Nancy groveling before the Dictator of Damascus in slave garb.
Maybe next time she visits Oakland she’ll be decked out in an Adidas tracksuit, Kangol hat and draped in gold chains. Just being culturally sensitive don’t you know?
Sweetness & Light points out the Logan Act and we’re left to wonder – what part of Treason is it that Democrats keep pretending to not understand?