Brace yourselves. Editorials are coming.
The Pollutico is dropping pamphlets across America overnight. Like Obama notifying ISIS truck drivers that they need to abandon their vehicles before air strikes, Pollutico is letting all you RWNJs know – the New York Times is not happy that you still have 2nd Amendment civil rights after some of their preferred Muzzloid invaders attempted kill several dozen of your fellow citizens.
“It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism.”
“It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment,” the editorial states. “No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.”
It’s actually not necessary to debate it at all if you want to be specific. I know we can’t be “distracted” by considering what actually happened and factoring that into the argument as to whether some new law would prevent it from happening again because that would make sense. It also wouldn’t promote the New York Times agenda which is anathema to public safety.
The point is we must act now without thinking while the blood on the floor hasn’t dried yet! Because that worked out so well with the Patriot Act, right?
I hope everyone knows what this means when the New York Times moves its usual far leftwing, communist editorials from the backpage to the frontpage – absolutely nothing. The historical significance of their spitflecked rage relies on the public not knowing that the only previous time they did this was to protest a Republican president from being elected after a racist bigot Democrat president whose name is currently being disappeared from campus buildings by college brownshirts all over the country in the fevered state of their high PC dudgeon.
There is no moral high ground for Pinch Sulzberger, Jr. to take here. When you have no morals, you cannot have moral outrage. With unwavering support, the NYT is steadfast in forcing the citizenry to pay for a holocaust of 30 million unborn murdered by Kermit Gosnells and to sell the parts for human experimentation and profit. So spare us the indignation routine or having the temerity to lecture the rest of us about having a “decency” that you are without.
Just the diminishing returns of an all-too-often leftwing temper tantrum for not being able to rule over the several hundred million people who give zero fucks what you or anyone from atop the ivory tower of the incestuously self-absorbed boroughs of New York thinks.